Abstract: Gender-based price discrimination, or “The Pink Tax,” is an economic bias that sees one gender charged a different price for the same goods or services. This "tax" is commonly levied on feminine-marketed products. Thus, “female” goods targeting are comparatively more expensive than those marketed to males. Previous research has confirmed the presence of gender-based price discrimination; this study expands this work by examining whether girls’ knowledge of these price disparities differs by high school type (single-sex or coeducational). Additionally, it evaluates the extent to which internalized sexism and/or relative masculinity vs. femininity contribute to adolescent girls’ knowledge.
147 participants chose between a series of binary product choices (masculine-advertised or feminine-advertised). They also completed 1) The Traditional Masculinity-Femininity (TMF) scale and 2) a self-designed Internalized Sexism Scale. These instruments evaluated subjects’ attitudes towards masculinity/femininity and gender roles. Additionally, participants were asked to define gender-based price discrimination in a free-response question. Both quantitative and qualitative coding and statistical analyses were undertaken. Adolescent girls' masculinity/femininity index was strongly correlated with tendency to choose feminine-advertised products. Those who most accurately defined gender-based discrimination reported significantly lower levels of internalized sexism. Unexpectedly, no significant differences between girls attending a single-sex school and those enrolled in a coeducational institution were found for any dependent variable. This suggests a societal-level problem beyond the reach of school environment.
References
[1] Avery, J. (2012). Defending the markers of masculinity: Consumer resistance to brand
gender-bending. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29(4), 322–336.
[2] Buckley, C. (2009, February 5). At the Cleaners, one Woman Seeks gender equality. The
New York Times. Retrieved September 10, 2021, from https://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/05/nyregion/05cleaners.html
[3] CBS Interactive. (2016, January 25). CBS news goes undercover to Reveal GENDER price
discrimination. CBS News. Retrieved September 10, 2021, from https://www.cbsnews.com/news/price-discrimination-gender-gap-cbs-news-undercover-dry-cleaners/.
[4] Center for Ethical Organizational Cultures Auburn University. (n.d.). Should Companies Be
Allowed to Engage in Gender Based Pricing? Auburn University. Retrieved August 6, 2021, from https://harbert.auburn.edu/binaries/documents/center-for-ethical-organizational-cultures/debate_issues/gender-based-discrimination.pdf.
[5] Dewhirst, T., Lee, W. B., Fong, G. T., & Ling, P. M. (2016, November). Exporting an
inherently harmful product: The marketing of Virginia Slims cigarettes in the United States, Japan, and Korea. Journal of business ethics : JBE. Retrieved April 9, 2022, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5181852/
[6] Esteban-Gonzalo, S., Sik Ying Ho, P., Aparicio-García, M. E., & Esteban-Gonzalo, L.
(2020, February 20). Understanding the meaning of conformity to feminine norms in lifestyle habits and Health: A Cluster Analysis. International journal of environmental research and public health. Retrieved September 10, 2021, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7068260/
[7] Horwitz, S. (2015, May 13). Is there really a Pink Tax?: Steven Horwitz. FEE Freeman
Article. Retrieved September 10, 2021, from https://fee.org/articles/is-there-really-a-pink-tax/
[8] Kane, J. (2017, December 7). This is the price of your period. HuffPost. Retrieved
September 10, 2021, from https://www.huffpost.com/entry/period-cost-lifetime_n_7258780
[9] Kachel, Sven & Steffens, Melanie & Niedlich, Claudia. (2016). Traditional Masculinity
and Femininity: Validation of a New Scale Assessing Gender Roles. Frontiers in Psychology. 7. 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00956.
[10] Marcinkowski, J. (2020, March 11). The real problem with the pink tax. The Cat's Eye
View. Retrieved September 10, 2021, from https://brhscatseyeview.org/10944/news/features/the-real-problem-with-the-pink-tax/.
[11] Marie, G. (2018, April 3). A cry for Lady Pens. Medium. Retrieved April 25, 2022, from
https://medium.com/@gretchen.freiermuth/a-cry-for-lady-pens-6e1637356dd5
[12] Mbai, D. (2020, October 21). "you've come a long way, baby!" or the story of how
Virginia Slims tried to 'emancipate' women through smoking. Gender and Intersectional Analysis. Retrieved April 9, 2022, from https://sites.tufts.edu/gender/youve-come-a-long-way-baby-or-the-story-of-how-virginia-slims-tried-to-emancipate-women-through-smoking/
[13] O'Barr, W.M. (2006). Representations of Masculinity and Femininity in Advertising.
Advertising & Society Review 7(2), doi:10.1353/asr.2006.0028.
[14] Palan, K. M. (2001). Gender identity in consumer behavior research: A literature review
and research agenda. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 2001(10), 1-31.
[15] Pink Tax. (n.d.). Because it shouldn't cost more to be a woman. The Pink Tax - Gender
Price The Pink Tax: The Persistence of Gender Price Disparity. 2019, http://research.monm.edu/mjur/files/2020/02/MJUR-i12-2019-Conference-4-Lafferty.pdf.
[16] Polk, M. (2018, October 24). Philip Morris: How Virginia Slims targeted women to sell
cigarettes. Medium. Retrieved April 9, 2022, from https://medium.com/@maggiepolk/philip-morris-how-virginia-slims-targeted-women-to-sell-cigarettes-e4bcf8271d2
[17] Sandhu, N. (2017). Consumer response to brand gender bending: An integrated review
and future research agenda. Business Perspectives and Research, 5(2), 151–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/2278533717692917
[18] The cost of doing femininity: Gendered disparities in pricing of personal care products and
services. Duesterhaus, M; Grauerholz, L; Weichsel, R; Guittar, NA Gender Issues); 2011 Vol. 28 Issue 4, p175-191, 17p. Document Type: article; (AN GI.BH.AGE.DUESTERHAUS.CDFGDP) [Citation Record], Database: EBSCO Publishing Citations
[19] Wakeman, J. (2020, August 6). The real cost of pink tax. Healthline. Retrieved September
10, 2021, from https://www.healthline.com/health/the-real-cost-of-pink-tax.